News for Agent

Daily business news: funding, M&A, launches

Regulation & Approvals

Ofcom Says It May Never Recover Every Online Safety Fine as 4chan's £520,000 Goes Unpaid

By ·

Key takeaways

  • Ofcom has issued 11 fines since March 2025, and only two have been paid.
  • 4chan owes a combined £520,000 across separate Online Safety Act penalties and has not paid.
  • Dame Melanie Dawes told MPs Ofcom may never recover every fine it issues.

Ofcom has issued 11 fines since March 2025 and collected payment on only two, leaving a £520,000 penalty against the US-based forum 4chan unpaid, the regulator's chief executive told Parliament on October 20, 2026. Yahoo reported the admission.

The 4chan Penalty and Its Unpaid Bill

Ofcom fined 4chan a combined £520,000, split across separate penalties for age assurance failures, an illegal-content risk assessment failure, and related Online Safety Act duties. The forum has not paid. Its lawyer, Preston Byrne, argues that 4chan has no UK staff, servers, or assets, meaning collection would likely require proceedings in the United States.

Byrne reportedly replied to Ofcom's payment demands with an AI-generated hamster image. He later described the exchange in reported remarks: "We replied with a hamster. Again."

A US federal court dismissed 4chan's own lawsuit against Ofcom on jurisdictional grounds, according to Devdiscourse, which reported in September 2026 that a Washington D.C. court dismissed the suit by 4chan and Kiwi Farms citing jurisdictional issues, according to akta.pro company records. That court also noted that US courts are not necessarily required to enforce foreign penal judgments, leaving the fine intact while complicating any practical recovery.

"We won't be able to recover every single fine on online safety," Dame Melanie Dawes, Ofcom's chief executive, told the UK Parliament's Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee on October 20, 2026.

How Ofcom Counts Enforcement Success

Of the 11 fines issued since March 2025, two have been paid, one is under appeal, one was not yet overdue, and nine remain unpaid, according to Ofcom's account to MPs. Among those nine unpaid cases, two pornography services introduced effective age assurance, four services geo-blocked UK users, and three remain accessible with their risks unmitigated.

Ofcom said its toolkit for pursuing overseas money includes domestic courts for any UK assets, debt-recovery specialists, financial investigators, foreign courts, and local law-enforcement agencies. Blocking orders against non-compliant services are also available, and Ofcom acknowledges those orders can be circumvented, with VPNs one commonly cited method.

Dame Melanie Dawes told MPs that Ofcom measures success not only by money recovered but by whether fined services introduce age checks, mitigate illegal-content risks, or remove UK access. For platforms with no UK assets, the practical enforcement lever is access restriction rather than a financial penalty.

Ofcom's Recent Enforcement Record

Ofcom fined telecoms provider Tismi £437,500 for failing to protect allocated phone numbers from misuse, Telecompaper reported on October 21, 2026. The fine, a 30% discount on £625,000, covered at least 366,000 sub-allocated numbers exposed between November 2022 and January 2025.

Meta asked the High Court to limit Ofcom's online safety fine calculations, arguing its definition of qualifying worldwide revenue is too broad, EIN Presswire reported on October 17, 2026. The hearing ended Wednesday, with Ofcom defending its approach and a judgment expected later.

Ofcom launched an investigation into Skydance UK's two-part series 'Power' over fairness and privacy under its Broadcasting Code, Yahoo reported on October 19, 2026. The drama, starring Martin Clunes, depicts allegations against Huw Edwards, who pleaded guilty to child pornography in 2024.

What Comes Next for Age Assurance

The UK government has indicated that under-16 social-media restrictions could come into force in 2027, requiring platforms to deploy effective age assurance for every user, not just for specific content. Dame Melanie Dawes told MPs those rules would be "much more draconian" for Meta than any US settlement the company has faced.

Companies in this story

Sources

Machine-readable: Markdown · JSON